Aspects of Disaster Risk Reduction in Disaster-Resilient Village (DRV)
Indonesia is a country included in a country prone to natural disasters. This study aimed to evaluate disaster risk reduction efforts in the resilient village of Bonto Tallasa District Maros. The research design used analytic descriptive with the number of samples that met the criteria of 22 respondents in Bonto Tallasa Village, Maros Regency. Data were obtained from interviews and direct observation. Evaluation of disaster risk reduction efforts uses six aspects of assessment: legal aspects, planning factors, institutional elements, funding aspects, capacity development aspects, and aspects of disaster management according to the findings of the study, which used a questionnaire with 60 questions and six domains of assessment aspects, three respondents stated that Bonto Tallasa village was included in the category of resilient village disaster, and 19 respondents stated that the primary resilient village, whose meaning was formed before the research, was still in the same category, namely strict village primary disaster.
BNPB. (2012). Pedoman Umum Desa/Kelurahan Tangguh Bencana. Jakarta: Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.
BAPPENAS (2010) National action plan for disaster risk reduction 2010–2012. Publishing Prevention Web. http://preventionweb.net/go/26346. Accessed June 1, 2014
Budiarti W dkk. (2017). Upaya Mitigasi Banjir di Sub DAS Samin Melalui Pengembangan Masyarakat Tangguh Bencana. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan. 18(2): 241-250.
Cutter S.L et al. (2012). Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. United States of America: The National Academies Press.
Destana. (2016). Dokumen PRB Destana 2016. Maros.
Fahlevi, H., Indriani, M. & Oktari, R.S., 2019, ‘Is the Indonesian disaster response budget correlated with disaster risk?’, JAMBA: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i1.759
Habibullah. (2013). Policy of Community Base Disaster Management: Kampung Siaga Bencana and Desa/Kelurahan Tangguh Bencana. Informasi. 18(2): 133-150.
Maarif S et al. (2012). Initiation of the Desa Tangguh Bencana Through Stimulus-Response Method. Indonesian Journal of Geography.
Matsuura, S. & Razak, K.A., 2019, ‘Exploring transdisciplinary approaches to facilitate disaster risk reduction,’ Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 28(6), 809–822. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2019-0289
Menne, B & Murray V. (2013). Floods in the WHO European Region: World Health Organization. Europe: Public Health England.
Munir M. (2016). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Desa Tangguh Bencana di Kabupaten Kendal Tahun 2016. Journal of Politic and Government Studies. Volume 6 Nomor 3.
Nguyen H et al. (2014). Applying Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment Tools in the Urban Contexts: Challenges, Difficulties, and New Approach. Vietnam: ISET.
Pusponegoro A.D & Sujudi A. (2016). Kegawatdaruratan dan Bencana Solusi dan Petunjuk Teknis Penanggulangan Medik dan Kesehatan. Rayyana Komunikasindo.
Anna, Alif N., Suharjo, & Priyana, Y., (2015), Kajian Biofisik Lahan untuk Penilaian Kerentanan Banjir di DAS Bengawan Solo Hulu, University Research Colloquium 2015 p:9-17.
Puturuhu, F., (2015), Mitigasi Bencana dan Pengeinderaan Jauh, Cetakan ke 1, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Kingma, N., (1991), Natural Hazard: GeomorphologicalAspect of Flood Hazard, The Netherlands: ITC
The study was presented at the APBM International Conference 2022.
Copyright (c) 2022 Andi Pujirana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.